NVIDIA has reportedly agreed to buy Hugging Face for $12.9 billion

The Information says NVIDIA has agreed to buy Hugging Face for $12.9 billion — nobody's confirming yet. Plus: an open-source AI exec team, Qwen's weights land, SourceHut bans AI contributions, and Copilot's org-wide default.

Share
NVIDIA has reportedly agreed to buy Hugging Face for $12.9 billion

The Information says NVIDIA has agreed to buy Hugging Face for $12.9 billion — the hub where open models live, and nobody is confirming it yet. A team that says it was let go built an open-source AI executive team instead of a résumé. Qwen shipped the open weights it had only teased when this issue's predecessor went to print, and Simon Willison had it generating pelican art within hours. SourceHut banned AI-assisted contributions outright, citing labor and climate alongside the usual copyright fight. And GitHub gave Copilot admins one org-wide switch that every future model will now silently obey. Five different bets this week on who ends up in charge of the places AI work actually lives.


Who buys the home of open models

NVIDIA has reportedly agreed to buy Hugging Face for $12.9 billion

NVIDIA has agreed to acquire Hugging Face for $12.9 billion, The Information reports, citing a person familiar with the deal; Business Insider had reported talks at more than $13 billion half a day earlier. Neither company has confirmed, and no terms are public beyond the figure. If it closes, the company selling the hardware open models run on would own the hub where open models live — including the Qwen weights two items down. The reaction split by venue: r/LocalLLaMA's two top threads of the day (1,608 and 1,168 points, nearly 800 comments between them) mostly treat a GPU vendor owning open source's neutral ground as bad news, while Hacker News had barely registered the story by mid-afternoon. Every "NVIDIA bought Hugging Face" post is ahead of the reporting: what's sourced is an agreement per one outlet, not a closed deal.

Nvidia to buy Hugging Face for $12.9 billion, report claims — could strengthen Nvidia’s open-model strategy and shore up position against rivals
Another major investmnet in AI ecosystem?

An open-source answer to a layoff

Let go, developers build an open-source AI executive team

A team of developers say they were let go and built OpenExecutive in response: eight Claude-based agents (CFO, CHRO, general counsel and five more) acting as one executive persona — open source, Apache-licensed, reachable over Slack, Discord, email or a CLI. The AI-replacement framing is the team's own unverifiable claim; their later comment gives just "Team was let go." Either way, 782 points and 522 comments made it the day's loudest Hacker News story.

GitHub - SenteLabsAI/OpenExecutive: AI-powered virtual executive team — a single coherent executive persona backed by 8 specialist Claude agents (FastAPI + Next.js).
AI-powered virtual executive team — a single coherent executive persona backed by 8 specialist Claude agents (FastAPI + Next.js). - SenteLabsAI/OpenExecutive

An open model, already running

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's weights are out; Willison ran it hours later

Qwen released Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's weights the same day yesterday's issue cut it for having none — 125 billion parameters, 6 billion active per token, an architecture Qwen calls an early preview of Qwen4. Simon Willison ran quantized versions on a DGX Spark within hours, generating pelican artwork from a 79GB build. Independent benchmarking site Artificial Analysis ranks it 4th of roughly 110 models in its class: fast, and unusually verbose. Open, running, and already independently tested.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Another open weights model from Qwen. This one is “a multimodal MoE model that also serves as an early preview of the architecture used in Qwen4”. It’s pretty big: 125B …

Setting the rules for AI in your codebase

SourceHut bans AI-assisted contributions starting September 10

SourceHut's terms of service now ban "original content written with or which facilitates the use of LLMs" anywhere on the platform: code, tickets, emails, effective September 10. The stated reasons go past copyright: AI's power draw, exploitation of unpaid open-source labor, and maintainer burnout from low-quality AI-assisted patches. Enforcement stays light: transparency over detection, nothing retroactive. It's the second platform this week to draw a hard line on AI contributions, after Debian's still-open vote.

Changes to SourceHut’s terms of service regarding LLMs
sourcehut is a network of useful open source tools for software project maintainers and collaborators, including git repos, bug tracking, continuous integration, and mailing lists.

GitHub Copilot's new models now inherit one org-wide default

GitHub made Copilot's "global model policy" generally available: admins pick one org-wide default, on or off, and every future model inherits it automatically instead of needing a manual review. Existing per-model overrides still hold; only unconfigured models follow the default. It's small governance plumbing with a real effect: a model your admin never got around to reviewing used to default to off by omission; now it silently follows whatever the org-wide switch says.

Global model policy generally available - GitHub Changelog
In July, we announced a default model policy for generally available GitHub Copilot models on Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise plans. Starting today, we’re gradually rolling out enforcement of the…

Know someone who'd want this in their inbox? Forward it — that's how this grows. And if we got something wrong, or you think we buried the real story today, hit reply. A person reads every one.

The New Way is human-curated — a person picks every story. The summaries are written with AI (Claude) and reviewed before we hit send.